Flexible New Deal PQQ results

The official results are now on the DWP website here in pdf format. Some more discussion coming up shortly

What do you make of the Green Paper?

Now it's out, does it match the hype? Will it be enough to stop the Conservatives from time-limiting benefits Wisconsin-style? Is it what you wanted it to be? Don't hold back now...

NDDP Results - official

After some prompting, the DWP have finally published the NDDP results from earlier this year here (rtf format).

Welfare Reform Green Paper contents leaked

Not by me, I hasten to add! BBC News is carrying the story here, and is highlighting the supposed wholesale lifting of Conservative policies. Proposals include:

  • Paying welfare to work providers using the savings made in benefit payments (i.e. relaxing the DEL / AME rules that have prevented this, as predicted by Freud and virtually everyone else at the recent W2W conference)

Key points from Mental health and employment (DWP report 513)

As the summary on the DWP site isn't terribly helpful, we've extracted the key points for moving people into work from this report. The report itself covers the entire employment process, but did not cover Pathways to Work areas and thus has a limited amount to say about it.

The following points seemed the most interesting for welfare to work providers:

  • Mental health-related IB claimants typically wanted to be in employment and understood the benefits that could derive from work

Should we publish bid results? (QotW)

We've published the Pathways to Work, NDDP, ESF and fND PQQ results prior to their official announcement on the DWP website. However, the DWP are apparently a bit grumpy about this - their view is that it jumps the gun and that subcontractors and staff in companies will assume results that may still change. Conversely, most providers and subcontractors I speak to say they prefer to find out what's going on as soon as possible. What do you think? Should we publish future results or not?

A4e rumours quashed

Around the time of the flexible New Deal launch, rumours circulated throughout the industry of financial problems at A4e. Hot on the heels of the collapse of Instant Muscle and Carter & Carter, this didn't seem entirely implausible.

Although A4e is still very much there, the rumours weren't openly discussed or denied. After talking with a few people at the welfare-to-work conference, I spoke with a director at A4e this week to confirm some details. He gave a convincing explanation which included:

DWP ESF Final update

All preferred bidders have now secured their contracts. All of the announced winners matched the preferred bidders in the story published here in April.

W2W - Plenary speech by Alan Cave and Chris Humphries

Alan Cave (Delivery Director, DWP)
Alan's speech solidified the vision of DWP as market developers, and reaffirmed their commitment to the black-box approach and payment on outcomes. He sounded a note of caution on Purnell's announcement of the 'right to bid', pointing out that this doesn't give the DWP a 'duty to fund' and that the Treasury would need to approve funding as appropriate.

W2W - Keynote speech by James Purnell

Analysis - New Deal performance 2008

Following a recent FoI request, the DWP have e-mailed us copies of their current performance data under the 'Flightpath' system, which tracks contract delivery for New Deal, Programme Centres, and one or two other programmes. We've published the e-mailed documents as file attachments at the bottom of this article, so you can carry out your own analysis on the source data if you wish. All UK contracts are covered by the data.

Summary of data

Too well to sit at home, too ill to work full-time

This blog post provides an insight into the way the benefits system can fall over when the lines between job readiness and illness become blurred. Not news, so not in the newswire, but interesting nonetheless.

This news story tells a similar tale of a woman in West Fife who is too sick to work but not sick enough to claim benefits.

Watch this space

The DWP have just responded to a FoI request with some mildly interesting information, but I need some time to go through it before sending it out. It appears they were less than helpful on the time period covered, however. Anyone fancy New Deal and Programme Centre performance statistics for all providers? All well and good, but how about if we limit that to just a 3 month period?! I'll publish what I can glean from the data shortly.

Choose your own article! (still open)

The weather was far too lovely to think about the next article over the weekend, but I feel a bit guilty about not putting something together now the newsletter time's come round. More importantly, I'm not actually sure what you want to hear about anyway. So now's your chance. What floats your boat? Gets your wick? What would you like to know more about? What dark and murky corners would you like a light to shine on? I promise to write articles about the first five responses, and any we like after that.

How can you tell if someone is job ready?

With the new NDDP contracts and flexible New Deal on the horizon, there's a lively debate going on about creaming and parking. But is it possible to predict who's ready to move into work anyway? Can a formal diagnostic ever be accurate enough to rely on, or are adviser's instincts the best guide?