Roy O’Shaughnessy calls for long-term vision
In our second regular commentary by industry leaders, Roy O’Shaughnessy, Chief Executive of Careers Development Group says we need a visionary and long-term commitment to eradicating poverty and worklessness.
He writes:
Sky News featured a middle aged couple in China, without employment, scouring the rubbish dumps each morning to eke out an existence, at the time of the interview, it was minus 25 degrees centigrade and the hovel they lived in was exposed to the elements and had no heat. The lady said: when my husband dies or we become too weak to search for rubbish there is nothing for me to do but die, there is no help available.
On the documentary “The Real Slumdog Millionaire” a man who had won what was considered a substantial sum in India proudly showed his studio home, with a flat screen TV, a sofa on which his mother in law slept in the evening, and the floor where he, his wife and children, slept each night.
Each culture and country determines what is acceptable for their people
I imagine that all in the sector are grappling with what is appropriate in our culture to encourage those who are unemployed and can work to do so, and second, how to assist each person to find long term sustainable employment and to assist each one to overcome the obstacles that stand in the way of success despite shrinking resources.
I propose:
- Our vision must be for a society in which unemployment does not exist, including the disabled. Focusing on even 55% employed through FND still leaves 45% of those unemployed. This 45% must receive more attention if many of the social ills we face today are to be effectively addressed, even if not funded through government initiatives. Big business exists to make profit, Charities such as CDG and others in the sector, must justify their public benefit, not only for the aspirational 55% but for all unemployed.
- To achieve this vision our commitment must be longer than the duration of any commercial contract. It is said that the Chinese plan a 1000 years ahead and the Catholic Church a 100 years ahead. Even with the most seamless provision the challenges we face will take three generations to solve. This must mean that no matter who we work for – commercial, Third Sector, Government – there is a need to blend the commercial and the charitable in a way that has not been accomplished in our lifetimes and the professionalism, training, and funding of our ventures must go beyond existing funding streams and partnerships.
- A massive national volunteer effort will need to be initiated that provides every unemployed person who cannot be readily employed through FND or its equivalent, with a trained mentor and linked with a local charity, company, or government office, to overcome the obstacles being faced over an extended period of time. This means an entirely new paradigm as to how the private sector, government and the Third Sector coordinate activities beyond the commercial contracts tendered
Can the above be accomplished? It can. But we should not look to government to lead these initiatives. This effort must come from the heart, the mind, and from linking resources – human and financial – that are outside the scope of any current tender process.
I know a man called Alex McElree, who had been in Vietnam, was an alcoholic and a drug addict and had been on the streets of San Francisco and Oakland for years. Social services had given up on him as he had on himself. He woke up on the streets of Oakland one morning and the homeless lady sleeping next to him was dead, she had died of exposure to the cold. From that moment on Alex did not touch alcohol or drugs and since then the organisation he created, Operation Dignity, has had amazing success in helping the homeless, particularly veterans, to overcome barriers and enter employment.
He accomplished this by simply deciding “he would not accept the way things were”.
We need to do the same.





Comments
Well said - sometimes we, as members of society, just have to make the time and think "out of the box", to go that extra mile and recognise that everyone has a purpose - despite the fact that many are facing significant and deeply rooted barriers. Those barriers do not just affect employment, but also impact on simple day-to-day living. For too many, categorisation into a time slot does not work. The previous New Deals and the current Flexible New Deal all have a place and have been/continue to be successful - however, we fail the severely marginalised and disaffected people in our society through lack of time for intense 1-1 support, resource, finance and partnership working, which in my humble opinion, is the key to empowering those people to move forward and progress.
There should be more blue sky thinking to achieve the art of the impossible, it can be done but it needs connections, that's what good societies are all about. Full unemployment is possible, look at the example of Pol Pot he got the whole country working, even the sick and disabled and the mentally ill can all work, they just need support. McMillan Cancer research has published a report that documents that people who are dying and undergoing cemo treatment have to attend back to work interviews: is this right? For some in W2W industry this would be considered best practice, but is it? I predict that the third sector will pick up the slack of the W2W industry: more for less.