About Us
Contact us
Can't see the wood for the trees? You need our free industry newswire
Subscribe
me!
Tell me
more
Username:
Password:
Forgotten
password?
Site content
Newswire
Knowledge base
Discussion
Events
Providers
Contracts
FoI requests
Consultancy
Industry search
Recent activity
flexible New Deal
Whither Indus Delta?
Traffic Light performance for all provisions
Christmas 2008
Key points from the Gregg Review of Conditionality
Compass and PCS give the anti-reform campaign some edge
More providers and contracts in our database
FoI request for provider performance data - in progress
Key points from the Welfare Reform White Paper
Third sector organisations and welfare to work
Cashflow and welfare-to-work provision
View
Edit
Title:
*
Topic:
All articles about a particular topic get 'tagged' with the name of the topic, making them easier to find
Body:
<em>Cashflow is the amount of money being received and spent by a business in a period of time</em> As the recent failures of Instant Muscle and Carter & Carter attest, many companies in the welfare-to-work industry have been facing problems in recent times. Some smaller providers have already fallen by the wayside (e.g. Olympian) or been absorbed into larger ones (Fern, Maatwerk) in recent years. The Jobcentre accredited provider list in 2002 numbered just over 1,000 organisations. Today it's 500, and that looks set to shrink substantially with the advent of Prime Contracting in both mainstream and ESF provision. While some of these providers will find niches subcontracting to the Primes, consolidation is a key trend in the coming years. One of the factors influencing this is simply the increasing cost and financial risk of delivering welfare-to-work provision. Changes in the payment structure will substantially change delivery cashflow compared to previous New Deal delivery. To demonstrate the impact of the changes, we've put together a financial model for flexible New Deal. It's attached as an Excel spreadsheet at the bottom of this article. If you're thinking of bidding for Prime Contractor something far more complex will be required, but it provides a useful illustration of some key points: <ul> <li>It will take lots of cash to set up provision - In the model, a £10m provision needs £2.5m in capital.</li> <li>You won't see the cash back for a few years - The model shows a break even point of almost 2 years, but a lower profit margin could extend this by another year or more.</li> <li>Falling short on job outcomes will cause a double hit - If you only get 90% of the job starts, then you can only expect 90% of the sustained job outcomes.</li> <li>All the cells in blue in the spreadsheet can be edited so you can see the impact of different figures, and of under- or over-performance against target. The base profit margin can't be changed yet, but we might put that in later. Play around with the 'actual' outcome figures and you'll soon see what financial risk translates to.</li> </ul> Given the state of lending at the moment, it's conceivable that many companies will have difficulty in raising the finance needed to set up provisions of this size. The size of each contract means that medium-size providers may only be able to take on a single area, potentially betting the entire company on a single delivery. Opinions? Questions? You can log in and edit the article or add a comment to it!
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h1> <h2> <h3> <del> <small>
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
You can embed tablemanager tables within your nodes using the following syntax:
[tablemanager:table_id,pagination,admin_links,column=?|start=?|end=?,attribute=?|attribute=?|...]
You may use
[view:viewname] tags
to display listings of nodes.
More information about formatting options
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.